The octagonal design, completed with cruciform arms, points to a sophisticated liturgical program. The central space would have concentrated the light and focus of worship, while the wings allowed circulation and distribution of the offices. By scale and symbolism, everything indicates we are dealing with a high-status building, associated with an influential community in a site of political and urban relevance since antiquity.
The proximity of Khor Virap adds an extra layer of cultural and devotional meaning. The sacred landscape of the area reinforces the value of the discovery for understanding the early centuries of Armenian Christianity. Although no ornamental or decorative materials have been disclosed yet, the floor plan, the construction technique visible in the foundations, and the radiometric dating allow comparisons with early Proto-Byzantine architectures.
The significance of the find extends beyond pure archaeology. On one hand, it offers early material evidence that dialogues with the country’s historical memory. On the other, it opens a research pathway into construction techniques, the circulation of master builders, and networks of artistic exchange in the Araks Valley. It also invites a reconsideration of the map of influences among Armenia, the Eastern Roman world, and neighboring kingdoms in the fourth century.
From a heritage-management perspective, identifying a structure of this scale requires an integrated strategy. Geotechnical studies will be needed to stabilize the foundations, along with in-situ conservation measures to protect them from the elements and a phased research plan that combines excavation, 3D recording, and laboratory analysis. The site’s interpretation for the public should balance access, protection, and responsible outreach.
In the medium term, the site could be incorporated into cultural routes connecting Artashat with Khor Virap and other landmarks in the area. Such an itinerary would foster knowledge-based tourism, with economic and educational benefits for local communities. The cooperation between Armenian and German specialists—exemplary in this campaign—accelerates the transfer of advanced methodologies and lays the groundwork for training programs and joint publications.
Next steps include delimiting construction phases, verifying possible remodels, and studying in detail associated mortars, ceramics, and organic remains. These analyses will refine the chronology and reconstruct liturgical practices, congregational dynamics, and the circulation of goods. In parallel, dialogue with museums and cultural authorities will be key to designing exhibitions, educational materials, and interpretive trails.
Beyond academic impact, the discovery carries powerful symbolic value for Armenian society. It provides tangible testimony to the early adoption of Christianity and to the creative capacity with which that faith was translated into architecture. Turning this news into a national project means maintaining the balance among research, conservation, and public communication. That virtuous triangle will transform an outstanding find into a shared legacy.
With studies underway, the newly identified church is emerging as a major piece for the art history and archaeology of the Caucasus. Its analysis promises new insights into the earliest chapters of sacred architecture in Armenia and will bolster—with solid evidence—the narrative of a heritage that still keeps secrets beneath the ground.
