However, Florida has taken a different tack. The decision not to create specific campaigns to attract the LGBTQ+ community has been seen by some as an exclusionary policy, while others see it as a reflection of the state's priorities under the current administration. Young defended the organisation's stance, arguing that Visit Florida's mission is to represent the state's diversity in an inclusive and neutral manner, without privileging any group over another. This approach, she said, is consistent with the mandate they have received.

Visit Florida's decision has sparked a wave of criticism and concerns, especially among LGBTQ+ rights organisations. These organisations have expressed that the lack of targeted campaigns could be interpreted as a sign of a lack of inclusion and openness towards the LGBTQ+ community. Furthermore, some tourism experts argue that this stance could have negative repercussions for Florida's tourism industry, particularly at a time when many travellers are seeking destinations that celebrate and support diversity.

It is important to note that LGBTQ+ tourism has proven to be a lucrative segment of the global industry. Destinations such as New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles, among others, have capitalised on this market by creating targeted campaigns and specific events that attract millions of tourists each year. These destinations have seen a positive impact on their local economies thanks to the arrival of LGBTQ+ tourists, who tend to have a high level of spending compared to other tourist segments.

In contrast, Florida, which has historically been a popular destination for all types of tourists, is at risk of being perceived as less welcoming to the LGBTQ+ community due to its current stance. This could affect not only the perception of the state nationally and internationally, but also its attractiveness as an inclusive and diverse tourist destination.

Visit Florida's stance also raises questions about the balance between state policies and the needs of an industry that, in many cases, depends on its ability to attract a wide variety of visitors. In an increasingly globalised and interconnected world, tourism destinations compete not only for the number of visitors, but also for their ability to offer experiences that resonate with the values and expectations of modern travellers.

In response to the criticism, Young has emphasised that Visit Florida does not exclude any group in its promotional campaigns, but neither will it run promotions that focus on a specific segment, such as LGBTQ+ tourism. This approach, she said, is part of an effort to promote Florida as a destination for all, without making distinctions based on sexual orientation, gender identity or other characteristics of visitors.

As the debate around Visit Florida's stance continues, it remains to be seen how this decision will affect the state's tourism industry in the coming years. Some analysts suggest that the stance could evolve in response to market pressures and changes in public perception. For the time being, however, Visit Florida appears to be committed to its current approach, following the guidelines set by the state government.