Some detractors point out that this model can distort the authenticity of destinations by adapting them exclusively to satisfy the demands of these select visitors. They also point out that luxury tourism can require high levels of resources and personalized services, which could contradict the principles of environmental sustainability if not carefully managed.

Opponents of the Genteel Home proposals argue that luxury tourism could encourage gentrification and an increase in the cost of living in the areas where it is installed, displacing local residents and affecting access to basic services. In addition, it is pointed out that this model may focus excessively on satisfying exclusive visitors, adapting the cultural and commercial offer to their needs and detracting from the authenticity of the destination. There are also concerns about the high consumption of resources that some luxury facilities require, which calls into question their long-term environmental sustainability.

Still, advocates argue that luxury tourism allows fewer tourists to generate a greater economic impact, distributing the benefits to the local economy without overburdening infrastructure. Luxury tourists tend to show a genuine interest in the culture and heritage of destinations, promoting respect for the environment and demanding services that favor sustainability. In addition, their preference for privacy and exclusivity is considered to contribute to reducing tourist concentration in public places and historic areas.

Luxury tourism, although the subject of debate and criticism, represents an expanding model that adds value to Spanish destinations, providing an alternative to overcrowding and promoting sustainability and local development.